> On Oct 4, 2023, at 03:18, Mark Tinka <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On 10/4/23 09:27, Elmar K. Bins wrote: >> >> >> Justin, >> >> I'm not sure you're not confusing scope here. >> >> Everybody and their sister accept smaller blocks from their customers; we're >> all talking about the DFZ here, not customer routes that you aggregate. > > Actually, we don't. > > From our customers, the most we are accepting today is a /24 and a /48. This > is for transit customers with their own AS and address space. > > Of course, if it's a DIA customer, we can assign longer prefixes, but that is > internal address space that belongs to us. > > Mark. Which if you read his message carefully is pretty much exactly what he said. Owen
- ODP: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ... Marcin Gondek
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ? Mark Tinka
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of ... Robert Blayzor via NANOG
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ? Robert Blayzor via NANOG
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ? Jakob Heitz (jheitz) via NANOG
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of ... Randy Bush
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length... Justin Wilson (Lists)
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix le... Elmar K. Bins
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefi... Mark Tinka
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp ... Elmar K. Bins
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp ... Owen DeLong via NANOG
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix le... William Herrin
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefi... Musa Stephen Honlue
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp ... Mark Tinka
- Re: maximum ipv4 ... Owen DeLong via NANOG
- Re: maximum ipv4 ... Crist Clark
- Re: maximum ipv4 ... Mark Tinka
- Re: maximum ipv4 ... Mark Tinka
- Re: maximum ipv4 ... Owen DeLong via NANOG
- Re: maximum ipv4 ... Matthew Petach
- Re: maximum ipv4 ... Mark Tinka

