> > I believe Jason's proposal is exactly what OP is looking for. >
I would agree. On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 11:28 AM Saku Ytti <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 at 17:39, Tom Beecher <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Auto-bandwidth won't help here if the bandwidth reduction is 'silent' as > stated in the first message. A 1G interface , as far as RSVP is concerned, > is a 1G interface, even if radio interference across it means it's > effectively a 500M link. > > Jason also explained the TWAMP + latency solution, which is an active > solution and doesn't rely on operator or automatic bandwidth providing > information, but network automatically measures latency and encodes > this information in ISIS, allowing automatic traffic engineering for > LSP to choose the lowest latency path. > I believe Jason's proposal is exactly what OP is looking for. > > -- > ++ytti >
