In addition to RSVP or may be worth using minimum modulation settings on the radios if possible. IE so that links completely drop and you re-route rather than run with less bandwidth.
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023, 6:34 PM Tom Beecher <[email protected]> wrote: > I believe Jason's proposal is exactly what OP is looking for. >> > > I would agree. > > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 11:28 AM Saku Ytti <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 at 17:39, Tom Beecher <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Auto-bandwidth won't help here if the bandwidth reduction is 'silent' >> as stated in the first message. A 1G interface , as far as RSVP is >> concerned, is a 1G interface, even if radio interference across it means >> it's effectively a 500M link. >> >> Jason also explained the TWAMP + latency solution, which is an active >> solution and doesn't rely on operator or automatic bandwidth providing >> information, but network automatically measures latency and encodes >> this information in ISIS, allowing automatic traffic engineering for >> LSP to choose the lowest latency path. >> I believe Jason's proposal is exactly what OP is looking for. >> >> -- >> ++ytti >> >
