On Sunday, January 14, 2024 6:01:45 AM UTC William Herrin wrote: > On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 12:58 PM Bryan Fields <br...@bryanfields.net> wrote: > > On 1/12/24 3:04 PM, Mu wrote: > > > Would it be possible for you to reply in-thread, rather than creating a > > > new thread with a new subject line every time you reply to someone? > > > > > > Trying to follow the conversation becomes very difficult for no reason. > > > > Threading has nothing to do with subject lines. RFC822 (now 5822) specifies > > how this works based on message ID. This thread displays fine in threaded > > mode in my MUA and in the archives. > > Hi Bryan, > > Respectfully, your MUA is not the only MUA. Others work differently. > > GMail, for example, follows the message IDs as you say but assumes > that if you change the subject line in your reply (more than adding > "Re:") then you intend to start a new thread from that point in the > discussion. It groups messages accordingly. > > This is not an unreasonable expectation: if you merely want to > continue the current conversation without going off on a new tangent > then there's no need for a different subject line. > > Regards, > Bill Herrin
I have been using KMail to read this list. Just thought I'd throw my hat in the ring there, I guess!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
