On Apr 19, 2010, at 3:16 AM, Chris Campbell wrote: > > On 19 Apr 2010, at 03:52, joel jaeggli wrote: > >> On 4/18/2010 6:28 PM, Patrick Giagnocavo wrote: >>> Franck Martin wrote: >>>> Sure the internet will not die... >>>> >>>> But by the time we run out of IPv4 to allocate, the IPv6 network will not >>>> have completed to dual stack the current IPv4 network. So what will happen? >>>> >>> >>> Reality is that as soon as SSL web servers and SSL-capable web browsers >>> have support for name-based virtual hosts, the number of IPv4 addresses >>> required will drop. Right now, you need 1 IP address for 1 SSL site; >>> SNI spec of SSL gets rid of that. >> >> my load balancer needs 16 ips for every million simultaneous >> connections, so does yours. >> > > I'm pretty sure that's not the case for inbound connections... > > http://vegan.net/pipermail/lb-l/2008-June/000871.html > Depends on which side of the loadbalancer you're talking about and how it is configured.
Owen
