In message <[email protected]>, Joel Jaeggli write s: > > On May 23, 2011, at 10:36 AM, Owen DeLong wrote: > > >=20 > >=20 > > Sent from my iPad > >=20 > > On May 23, 2011, at 11:32, David Conrad <[email protected]> wrote: > >=20 > >> On May 23, 2011, at 8:28 AM, Mark Farina wrote: > >>> Is the DoD releasing this range to Rogers? > >>=20 > >> Unlikely, although it might be an interesting case of testing ARIN's = > transfer policy if it was the case :-). > >>=20 > >>> Or has Rogers squatted on this space due to exhaustion of their 10/8 = > use? > >>=20 > >=20 > > More likely they are making the assumption that their private internal = > use of the address > > space won't conflict with DoD's (apparently) private internal use of = > the address space. > > if they're numbering cpe out of it they've also decided that breaking = > 6to4 is no problem either, if they aren't then hey it's just more ipv4 = > ugliness, and there's alot more where that came from... > > joel=
and other stuff which doesn't work in a double nat environment. -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [email protected]
