On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore <[email protected]> wrote: > On May 24, 2011, at 12:02 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote: >> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Owen DeLong <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I don't think they have to hijack space from DoD. I think there are a >>> number of other options available to them. They might cost more, but, >>> they also come with somewhat lower risks >> >> the good thing is 7 exists on networks that will never see the light >> of day... so it's just like 10! only lower and cooler! (and lucky, if >> you believe the movies and all) > > It's not just whether those networks will ever leak 7. It's whether the DoD > will ever announce anything in 7. > > If they do, any Rogers customer who wants to talk to it is screwed. Whether > they have a 7 addy or not, Rogers' routers will not let the packet leave > Rogers' borders. >
Now, the onus is on the DoD to make its content available over unique IPv6 space so that the Roger's customers can get to it using the 6to4-PMT solution. There is always a solution. Cameron > -- > TTFN, > patrick > > >
