On May 25, 2011, at 11:43 AM, Christopher Pilkington wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:25 AM, Michael Dillon > <[email protected]> wrote: >> So we should CONDONE such borrowing and recommend a couple of /8s to >> use in North America. Perhaps one could be DOD for those operators >> that do not carry any DOD traffic and one could be that /8 from >> Softbank Japan, 126/8 if I recall it correctly. People who carry DOD >> traffic could borrow the APNIC block. > > I recommend 44/8. Does it make sense that ham radio operators have > routable IP address space any longer? (Seems to be still advertised, > though.) > > -cjp (n2mcs)
Why shouldn't they? Owen DeLong KB6MER
