On May 25, 2011, at 11:12 PM, Matthew Kaufman wrote: > > On May 26, 2011, at 7:35 AM, Owen DeLong wrote: > >>> >> >> Unfortunately, the FCC hasn't really allowed us to since it would be very >> hard to produce useful bandwidth by today's standards within the bounds >> of the spectrum we are allowed to use and the channel separations we >> are allowed to use. >> > > You just need to move up in frequency a bit. My slowest ham-band link runs at > 12 Mbps and my fastest at over 100 Mbps. >
Re: 100Mbps... Yeah, for a modern household LAN, you're at about 1/3rd my minimum bandwidth and 1/10th my current maximum. For wide area purposes, you're at about 1/100th of the smallest circuits we're running in the modern backbone. > Good reminder that I should renumber the IPv4 portion of that network to > somewhere in 44.0.0.0/8 however. > Yeah, not a bad idea. Wonder if we can get a /32 for AMPR from IETF since it would be prohibitively expensive to get it from an RIR. Owen
