On 3/28/2012 12:13 PM, Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo wrote:
I'm not convinced. What you mention is real, but the code they need is
little more than a regular expression that can be found on Google and a
20-line script for testing lames. And a couple of weeks of testing, and
I think I'm exaggerating.
If they don't want to offer support for it, they can just put up some
disclaimer.
regards,
Carlos
On 3/28/12 3:55 PM, David Conrad wrote:
On Mar 28, 2012, at 11:47 AM, Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo wrote:
I'm not a fan of conspiracy theories, but, c'mon. For a provisioning
system, an AAAA record is just a fragging string, just like any other
DNS record. How difficult to support can it be ?
Of course it is more than a string. It requires touching code, (hopefully)
testing that code, deploying it, training customer support staff to answer
questions, updating documentation, etc. Presumably Netsol did the cost/benefit
analysis and decided the potential increase in revenue generated by the vast
hordes of people demanding IPv6 (or the potential lost in revenue as the vast
hordes transfer away) didn't justify the expense. Simple business decision.
Regards,
-drc
That's assuming their system is sanely or logically designed. It could
be a total disaster of code, which makes adding such a feature a major pain.
--John
