Thanks guys. That was an informative read. I will do some more troubleshooting.
Derek On Sep 26, 2012, at 1:16 PM, Darius Jahandarie <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Blake Dunlap <[email protected]> wrote: >> This is not the proper way to interpret traceroute information. Also, 3 >> pings is not sufficient to determine levels of packet loss statistically. >> >> I suggest searching the archives regarding traceroute, or googling how to >> interpret them in regards to packet loss, as what you posted does not >> indicate what you think it does. > > Agreed. Derek should read "A Practical Guide to (Correctly) > Troubleshooting with Traceroute": > http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog45/presentations/Sunday/RAS_traceroute_N45.pdf > > -- > Darius Jahandarie
