Or alternately: Verizon wishes money to accept data it requested from other vendors, film at 11.
It's all in the application of the angular momentum... -Blake On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Randy Bush <ra...@psg.com> wrote: > > Even better by Verizon - > > > http://publicpolicy.verizon.com/blog/entry/unbalanced-peering-and-the-real-story-behind-the-verizon-cogent-dispute > > > > Some may recognize the name of the author for the WSJ article given > > she attended NANOG in Orlando - > > > http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB10001424127887323836504578553170167992666-lMyQjAxMTAzMDEwOTExNDkyWj.html > >> > >> > http://gigaom.com/2013/06/19/peering-pressure-the-secret-battle-to-control-the-future-of-the-internet/ > > as someone who does not really buy the balanced traffic story, some are > eyeballs and some are eye candy and that's just life, seems like a lot > of words to justify various attempts at control, higgenbottom's point. > > randy > >