> What the enterprise folks need is IPv6 champions, like yourself, like Lee, to > user stand their use case that even if you don't end up deploying it on your > own network you will show up at the IETF, or at least participate on the IETF > mailing lists and help them get what they need, so IPv6 deployment can > proceed apace. If you really don't think there is harm, help them go get > what they (think they?) need.
I don’t think there’s harm to including the option for RIO in DHCPv6. I think there is great harm in continuing the use case presented earlier. I have yet to see a use case from enterprise that actually requires RIO or default route in DHCPv6, and I have seen many many use cases. Most of them are, actually, better solved through education, so I tend to focus my efforts in that area. If you can find someone who wants to pay me to plead the enterprise cases to the IETF, I suppose I might be interested in that job if it came with the right offer, but for now, that’s not what I get paid to do. Owen
