On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Cb B <[email protected]> wrote: > On Jan 14, 2014 6:01 PM, "Eric A Louie" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I have a connection to a peering fabric and I'm not distributing the > peering fabric routes into my network. >>
good plan. >> I see three options >> 1. redistribute into my igp (OSPF) >> >> 2. configure ibgp and route them within that infrastructure. All the > default routes go out through the POPs so iBGP would see packets destined > for the peering fabric and route it that-a-way >> >> 3. leave it "as is", and let the outbound traffic go out my upstreams and > the inbound traffic come back through the peering fabric >> >> 4. all peering-fabric routes get next-hop-self on your peering router before going into ibgp... all the rest of your network sees your local loopback as nexthop and things just work. >> Advantages and disadvantages, pros and cons? Recommendations? > Experiences, good and bad? >> >> >> I have 5 POPs, 2 OSPF areas, and have not brought iBGP up between the > POPs yet. That's another issue completely from a planning perspective. >> >> thanks >> Eric >> > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5963 > > I like no-export
