----- Original Message ----- > From: "Hugo Slabbert" <hslabb...@stargate.ca>
> I guess that's the question here: If additional transport directly > been POPs of the two parties was needed, somebody has to pay for the > links. Releases around the deal seemed to indicate that the peering > was happening at IXs (haven't checked this thoroughly), so at that > point it would seem reasonable for each party to handle their own > capacity to the peering points and call it even. No? And the answer is: at whose instance (to use an old Bell term) is that traffic moving. The answer is "at the instance of the eyeball's customers". So there's no call for the eyeball to charge the provider for it. Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink j...@baylink.com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://www.bcp38.info 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA BCP38: Ask For It By Name! +1 727 647 1274
