On 6/13/14, 8:26 AM, James R Cutler wrote: > On Jun 13, 2014, at 10:39 AM, Lee Howard <l...@asgard.org> wrote: > >> We've corresponded offline. >> >> I documented the difficulties in providing reverse DNS for IPv6 >> residential users in http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-howard-isp-ip6rdns-06 >> It's a long-expired draft, which never found sufficient support from a WG >> or AD. I've been meaning to rewrap it as a BCOP, but lack cycles. >> >> Lee >> >> On 6/12/14 11:58 AM, "hasser css" <hasserva...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Some IPv6 email is not working well for me on my TWC Internet connection >>> due to their IPv6 block not having PTR records. >>> >>> Is it possible for me to delegate my IPv6 range to my own DNS server, or >>> something similar? I have talked to level 3 support and they were pretty >>> much clueless, so I decide to ask here if anyone has insight or similar >>> issues in the past. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >> >> > This exchange brings to mind several questions (and comments): > > 1. Should not RFC 1033 be considered “Historic”? > I note that iPv6 was only a faint longing and otherwise undefined at > that time. > > 2. What is the real rdns business requirement for residential customers? > I have difficulty finding anything but SMTP servers needing rdns > entries. > Practical end-to-end security should be independent of media and > addressing.
I would like an authoritative nameserver to give me as quickly is possible. imho lame delegation of reverse is way worse then not having a ptr. > 3. Would this question be better posed on the “mailop” mailing list (if SMTP > service is the issue) or perhaps dns-operati...@mail.dns-oarc.net? > > Since “hasser css” did not explain his business requirement for rdns, it > really difficult to provide advice. > > > James R. Cutler > james.cut...@consultant.com > PGP keys at http://pgp.mit.edu > > >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
