On Fri 2014-Oct-03 17:21:08 -0700, Michael Van Norman <[email protected]> wrote:
IANAL, but I believe they are. State laws may also apply (e.g. California Code - Section 502). In California, it is illegal to "knowingly and without permission disrupts or causes the disruption of computer services or denies or causes the denial of computer services to an authorized user of a computer, computer system, or computer network." Blocking access to somebody's personal hot spot most likely qualifies.
My guess would be that the hotel or other organizations using the blocking tech would probably just say the users/admin of the rogue APs are not authorized users as setting up said AP would probably be in contravention of the AUP of the hotel/org network.
/Mike
-- Hugo
On 10/3/14 5:15 PM, "Mike Hale" <[email protected]> wrote:So does that mean the anti-rogue AP technologies by the various vendors are illegal if used in the US? On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Jay Ashworth <[email protected]> wrote:----- Original Message -----From: "Ricky Beam" <[email protected]>It doesn't. The DEAUTH management frame is not encrypted and carries no authentication. The 802.11 spec only requires a reason code be provided.What's the code for E_GREEDY? Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [email protected] Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://www.bcp38.info 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA BCP38: Ask For It By Name! +1 727 647 1274-- 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
