I have used the BeagleBone to run a few simple servers. I don't know if the ethernet port on the Bone is on the USB bus. It is slightly more expensive than a PI, but they have worked well for me.

        Geoff

On 02/18/2015 04:44 PM, Peter Loron wrote:
For any site where you would use a Pi as the DNS cache, it won't be an issue. DNS isn't that heavy at those query rates.

Yeah, it would be awesome if they'd been able to get a SoC that included ethernet.

-Pete

On 2015-02-18 15:08, Robert Webb wrote:
What I do not like about the Pi is the network port is on the USB bus
and thus limited to USB speeds.

<div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Maxwell Cole
<[email protected]> </div><div>Date:02/18/2015  4:30 PM
(GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: "[email protected] >> 'NANOG list'"
<[email protected]> </div><div>Subject: Re: OT - Small DNS "appliances"
for remote offices. </div><div>
</div>

Reply via email to