You also have to watch out for issues with the Pi corrupting SD cards. On 19 Feb 2015 01:04, "Geoff Mulligan" <nano...@mulligan.org> wrote:
> I have used the BeagleBone to run a few simple servers. I don't know if > the ethernet port on the Bone is on the USB bus. It is slightly more > expensive than a PI, but they have worked well for me. > > Geoff > > On 02/18/2015 04:44 PM, Peter Loron wrote: > >> For any site where you would use a Pi as the DNS cache, it won't be an >> issue. DNS isn't that heavy at those query rates. >> >> Yeah, it would be awesome if they'd been able to get a SoC that included >> ethernet. >> >> -Pete >> >> On 2015-02-18 15:08, Robert Webb wrote: >> >>> What I do not like about the Pi is the network port is on the USB bus >>> and thus limited to USB speeds. >>> >>> <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Maxwell Cole >>> <mcole.mailingli...@gmail.com> </div><div>Date:02/18/2015 4:30 PM >>> (GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: "nanog@nanog.org >> 'NANOG list'" >>> <nanog@nanog.org> </div><div>Subject: Re: OT - Small DNS "appliances" >>> for remote offices. </div><div> >>> </div> >>> >> >