On Wed, 27 May 2015 16:11:19 +0300, Saku Ytti said: > This is second reply to this notion. I don't understand what is attempted to > communicate. I'm sure no one on nanog thinks BGP hijacks are rare, difficult > or yield to consequences when called out.
What *is* rare is a BGP hijack done solely to intercept a confirmation e-mail sent to Joe Sixpack when he's trying to get his Gmail account back. Can anybody provide a *single* example of that being done? Now, if it's Joe CEO or Joe Prime Minister, the calculus changes a bit. But as I said - at that point, you have bigger things to worry about.
pgplHWQjhcdLU.pgp
Description: PGP signature