So....ultimately, what's the answer? A huge number of low cost, low power WAPs? Eager readers want to know. :) On Jun 20, 2015 10:30 PM, "Randy Bush" <ra...@psg.com> wrote:
> > My understanding is that the most recent NANOG had issues with clients > > picking channels sequentially vs by signal strength. There may have > > been other issues but when all devices use 149 because that's the > > first they can and they get link that's not good. > > we're lucky those mean vicious bad clients don't also come to ietf, > wwdc, crisco live, ... oh wait ... > > you are blaming the customer as if you worked for a telco. oh wait ... > :) > > > If people know of tricks to solve this when there are 600-1000 devices > > per room i am certain the NANOG eng team would love to know about it. > > clue: with 600-1000 geeks there are gonna be 2k-4k devices. > > randy >
