Yes, but TBH, they are advertised as a darkspace collection project, so Cisco’s use is actually somewhat helpful to that activity.
It’s unlikely that 1.1.1.0/24 or 1.2.3.0/24 will ever be allocated by APNIC. Owen > On Jul 10, 2015, at 22:47 , Julien Goodwin <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 11/07/15 08:25, Shane Ronan wrote: >> 1.1.1.1 is usually a good bet > > Sadly yes, even though it's valid public IP space Cisco still have it > documented as their suggested captive portal address. > > Despite it (and 1.2.3.0/24) being advertised by $ORK for years at this point > on behalf of APNIC.
