On 27 September 2015 at 18:38, Lyle Giese <[email protected]> wrote:
> Part of freedom is to minimize the harm and I think that is where the > parties replying to this thread diverge. A broken change that causes harm > should have/could have been tested better before releasing it to the public > on the Internet. > > Or if a bad release is let loose on the Internet, how does Google minimize > the harm? How would this be any different by google introducing TCP related issue in their frontend servers? This is not a protocol issue, this is QA issue that could impact arbitrary technology. I'd like to say I've not broken stuff by misunderstanding impact of my changes, but unfortunately I can't. -- ++ytti
