looks like ip-echelon's MX's are: 67.43.171.100 - 67.43.171.96/27 67.43.165.163 - 67.43.165.160/27 203.122.134.3 - 122-134-3.dsl.connexus.net.au. ?
you could presumably just iptables away (or postfix reject) from those, and then there's this: ;; ANSWER SECTION: ip-echelon.com. 300 IN TXT "v=spf1 include:mailgun.org ~all" ip-echelon.com. 300 IN TXT "v=spf1 include:mail.zendesk.com ?all" ip-echelon.com. 300 IN TXT "v=spf1 ptr:ip-echelon.com ip4:67.43.171.96/27 ip4:67.43.165.160/27 ip4:203.122.134.0/28 include:_spf.google.com ~all" ip-echelon.com. 300 IN TXT "MS=ms85153493" joy. messy :( On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 10:36 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 14:20:39 +0200, Randy Bush said: >> >> http://www.procmail.org/ >> > I wouldn't necessarily recommend that approach. There is no >> > obligation for victims of spammers to continue providing Internet >> > services to them, including SMTP services. >> >> computers are cheap. my time is finite and i value it highly. what is >> the minimal action i can take to see that idiots do not take my time? > > I suppose it would be bad form to suggest hiring somebody from <insert > favorite > crime cartel> with a Louisville Slugger to perform percussive maintenance on > the offending party? >
