pretty certain that the list ought not be pushing for bodily harm to individuals... it's fair to say: "trash all their mail" or "block their mailservers at the edge"
but calling out hits .. not cool. On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Andrew Kirch <[email protected]> wrote: > Minimal? Probably 22LR. I prefer 458SOCOM though. As Bob Evans notes, > there may be some waiting periods, serial numbers, and background checks > involved. :) > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 8:20 AM, Randy Bush <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> http://www.procmail.org/ >> > I wouldn't necessarily recommend that approach. There is no >> > obligation for victims of spammers to continue providing Internet >> > services to them, including SMTP services. >> >> computers are cheap. my time is finite and i value it highly. what is >> the minimal action i can take to see that idiots do not take my time? >> >> randy >>
