Yet until Apple gets to that IPv6-only stage, you’re refusing to support IPv6 for those of us that need it today even while we still need IPv4, too.
Owen > On Dec 22, 2015, at 10:08 , Ca By <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, December 22, 2015, Owen DeLong <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Does this mean you are negligent for not supporting IPv6 on my phone on your > network? > > My phone is perfectly capable of IPv6, yet because it doesn’t support your > particular religion > about IPv4 translation, you refuse to support IPv6 on it. > > When is T-Mobile going to fix their IPv6 implementation and stop ignoring the > #1 market > leading phone manufacturer? > > Owen > > > Apple has an ipv6-only plan in the link above. They have committed to remove > the ipv4 dependent apps from the app store. Once the ipv4-only apps are > bannished, i dont see any roadblocks for ipv6 on iPhone. > > While you say there is a religious war, i am saying Apple outlined a plan for > ipv6-only and T-Mobile is likely to follow that plan from Apple. > > CB > > > > On Dec 22, 2015, at 04:45 , Ca By <[email protected] <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > TL;DR version: the data shows you are negligent if your eyeball content > > (cdn, cloud, ...) does not support native ipv6. > > > > With the NAT and IPv4 leasing threads lingering on, i figured it was time > > for an update on how the other half live > > > > More than 1/3 of North America mobile traffic to the top websites is end to > > end ipv6 > > http://www.worldipv6launch.org/2015-wrapup-more-than-13-us-mobile-traffic-is-ipv6-and-still-growing/ > > > > <http://www.worldipv6launch.org/2015-wrapup-more-than-13-us-mobile-traffic-is-ipv6-and-still-growing/> > > > > The trend is clearly growing, and as AT&T and Sprint catch up with T-Mobile > > and Verizon, the acceleration to 50% should be easily achieved. > > Furthermore, only one mobile carrier has iPhone dual-stacked today (afaik), > > but Apple has a plan for banning ipv4-only apps and has delivered the > > required features for having ipv6-only iphones in 2016 with these iOS 9.2 > > features > > > > https://developer.apple.com/library/ios/documentation/NetworkingInternetWeb/Conceptual/NetworkingOverview/UnderstandingandPreparingfortheIPv6Transition/UnderstandingandPreparingfortheIPv6Transition.html > > > > <https://developer.apple.com/library/ios/documentation/NetworkingInternetWeb/Conceptual/NetworkingOverview/UnderstandingandPreparingfortheIPv6Transition/UnderstandingandPreparingfortheIPv6Transition.html> > > > > On some mobile providers, ipv6 is already dominant and ipv4 is waning. Once > > iPhones updates to ipv6-only as described above, ipv4 will only be a corner > > case of operations. This comes with added benefit that ipv6 is faster : > > > > https://code.facebook.com/posts/1192894270727351/ipv6-it-s-time-to-get-on-board/ > > > > <https://code.facebook.com/posts/1192894270727351/ipv6-it-s-time-to-get-on-board/> > > > > At least in mobile, the change to ipv6 has been quick and the pace is > > increasing -- not just on ipv6 deployment but also on ipv4 shutdown. I know > > many people liken ipv6 to "the boy who cried wolf", so be it, the > > data shows the ipv6 wolf is here. Or perhapsin hind sight, we will see > > the right metaphor was "the tortoise and the hare" or "the little engine > > that could"... Or even better IPv4 is John Henry. It was the best in its > > time, but times have changed. > > > > CB >
