I wonder if Tmobile realizes that when you sign up for a contract with them using one of their phones as a wifi hotspot, the address of their enterprise NAT is what's recorded by their form. They even make you check a button to accept their lack of security.
Not that that could result in massive fraud or anything. Not that massive fraud is a problem for Tmobile either come to think of it. On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com> wrote: > Yet until Apple gets to that IPv6-only stage, you’re refusing to support IPv6 > for those of us > that need it today even while we still need IPv4, too. > > Owen > >> On Dec 22, 2015, at 10:08 , Ca By <cb.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Tuesday, December 22, 2015, Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com >> <mailto:o...@delong.com>> wrote: >> Does this mean you are negligent for not supporting IPv6 on my phone on your >> network? >> >> My phone is perfectly capable of IPv6, yet because it doesn’t support your >> particular religion >> about IPv4 translation, you refuse to support IPv6 on it. >> >> When is T-Mobile going to fix their IPv6 implementation and stop ignoring >> the #1 market >> leading phone manufacturer? >> >> Owen >> >> >> Apple has an ipv6-only plan in the link above. They have committed to remove >> the ipv4 dependent apps from the app store. Once the ipv4-only apps are >> bannished, i dont see any roadblocks for ipv6 on iPhone. >> >> While you say there is a religious war, i am saying Apple outlined a plan >> for ipv6-only and T-Mobile is likely to follow that plan from Apple. >> >> CB >> >> >> > On Dec 22, 2015, at 04:45 , Ca By <cb.li...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> >> > wrote: >> > >> > TL;DR version: the data shows you are negligent if your eyeball content >> > (cdn, cloud, ...) does not support native ipv6. >> > >> > With the NAT and IPv4 leasing threads lingering on, i figured it was time >> > for an update on how the other half live >> > >> > More than 1/3 of North America mobile traffic to the top websites is end to >> > end ipv6 >> > http://www.worldipv6launch.org/2015-wrapup-more-than-13-us-mobile-traffic-is-ipv6-and-still-growing/ >> > >> > <http://www.worldipv6launch.org/2015-wrapup-more-than-13-us-mobile-traffic-is-ipv6-and-still-growing/> >> > >> > The trend is clearly growing, and as AT&T and Sprint catch up with T-Mobile >> > and Verizon, the acceleration to 50% should be easily achieved. >> > Furthermore, only one mobile carrier has iPhone dual-stacked today (afaik), >> > but Apple has a plan for banning ipv4-only apps and has delivered the >> > required features for having ipv6-only iphones in 2016 with these iOS 9.2 >> > features >> > >> > https://developer.apple.com/library/ios/documentation/NetworkingInternetWeb/Conceptual/NetworkingOverview/UnderstandingandPreparingfortheIPv6Transition/UnderstandingandPreparingfortheIPv6Transition.html >> > >> > <https://developer.apple.com/library/ios/documentation/NetworkingInternetWeb/Conceptual/NetworkingOverview/UnderstandingandPreparingfortheIPv6Transition/UnderstandingandPreparingfortheIPv6Transition.html> >> > >> > On some mobile providers, ipv6 is already dominant and ipv4 is waning. Once >> > iPhones updates to ipv6-only as described above, ipv4 will only be a corner >> > case of operations. This comes with added benefit that ipv6 is faster : >> > >> > https://code.facebook.com/posts/1192894270727351/ipv6-it-s-time-to-get-on-board/ >> > >> > <https://code.facebook.com/posts/1192894270727351/ipv6-it-s-time-to-get-on-board/> >> > >> > At least in mobile, the change to ipv6 has been quick and the pace is >> > increasing -- not just on ipv6 deployment but also on ipv4 shutdown. I know >> > many people liken ipv6 to "the boy who cried wolf", so be it, the >> > data shows the ipv6 wolf is here. Or perhapsin hind sight, we will see >> > the right metaphor was "the tortoise and the hare" or "the little engine >> > that could"... Or even better IPv4 is John Henry. It was the best in its >> > time, but times have changed. >> > >> > CB >> >