Right, but that doesn't limit one's ability (intentional or not) to pull out 
the wrong power cord or smack someone's loosely ran cables, etc. We're sorting 
out some standards now and I think it'll largely involve color coding, wire 
looms, horizontal cable management and a "cabinet practices" document defining 
standards for use in the cabinet. This is meant to protect customers from 
themselves and each other. 

IE: Someone is removing a power cable and the pull the wrong one out of the 
PDU. Maybe they pull the right one out of the PDU, but it's wrapped around 
someone else's power cable and theirs gets pulled out along the way. Stuff like 
that. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

Midwest-IX 
http://www.midwest-ix.com 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Greg Sowell" <g...@gregsowell.com> 
To: "Mike Hammett" <na...@ics-il.net> 
Cc: "NANOG list" <nanog@nanog.org> 
Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2016 10:16:17 AM 
Subject: Re: Shared cabinet "security" 


Mike, 
I've seen people use shelves to segregate cabinets. I've seen some that screw 
from both sides and eat very little space. 
Greg 
On Feb 13, 2016 8:07 AM, "Mike Hammett" < na...@ics-il.net > wrote: 


Getting a cabinet in someone else's datacenter (Equinix, Coresite, Telx, etc.) 
and having sub-tenants. Most networks aren't going to need more than a handful 
of U in a datacenter, but the more significant the datacenter, the less likely 
they are to provide partial cabinets... which makes no sense. Sure, some 
networks need large chassis routers chewing up 10U - 20U, but there are far 
more networks that need routers that take up 1U, 2U, something like that. For 
many networks, the sheer cost of the space in the datacenter doubles their 
overall cost per megabit. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

Midwest-IX 
http://www.midwest-ix.com 

----- Original Message ----- 

From: "Bevan Slattery" < be...@slattery.net.au > 
To: "Mike Hammett" < na...@ics-il.net > 
Cc: "North American Network Operators' Group" < nanog@nanog.org > 
Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2016 2:36:34 AM 
Subject: Re: Shared cabinet "security" 


Sorry. I'm not sure I get from which angle you are coming at this from. Happy 
to clarify for you and anyone interested if you can help me out here. 


Cheers 

[b] 

On 13 Feb 2016, at 12:58 PM, Mike Hammett < na...@ics-il.net > wrote: 





There are more options when you're not just using someone else's datacenter. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

Midwest-IX 
http://www.midwest-ix.com 

----- Original Message ----- 

From: "Bevan Slattery" < be...@slattery.net.au > 
To: "Mike Hammett" < na...@ics-il.net > 
Cc: "North American Network Operators' Group" < nanog@nanog.org > 
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 4:44:34 PM 
Subject: Re: Shared cabinet "security" 

In a past life we worked with our supplier to create physically separate 
sub-enclosures.1/2 and 1/3. Able to build in a separate and secure cable path 
for interconnects to the meet-me-room and connection to power supplies. 

Can be done and I think there are now rack suppliers that do this as standard. 
Been out of DC space for a few years now. 

[b] 

> On 13 Feb 2016, at 6:58 AM, Mike Hammett < na...@ics-il.net > wrote: 
> 
> 
> That moment when you hit send and remember a couple things… 
> 
> Of course labeling of the cables. 
> 
> Maybe colored wire loom for fiber and DACs in the vertical spaces to go along 
> with the previously mentioned color scheme? 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- 
> Mike Hammett 
> Intelligent Computing Solutions 
> http://www.ics-il.com 
> 
> Midwest-IX 
> http://www.midwest-ix.com 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> 
> From: "Mike Hammett" < na...@ics-il.net > 
> To: "North American Network Operators' Group" < nanog@nanog.org > 
> Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 2:53:17 PM 
> Subject: Re: Shared cabinet "security" 
> 
> 
> I am finding a bunch of covers for the front. I do wish they stuck out more 
> than an inch (like two). 
> http://www.middleatlantic.com/~/media/middleatlantic/documents/techdocs/s_sf%20series%20security%20covers_96-035/96_035s_sf.ashx
>  
> 
> It looks like these guys stick out 1.5”. That may be workable… 
> http://www.lowellmfg.com/tinymce/jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/filemanager/files/1717-SSCV.pdf
>  
> 
> I guess those covers are really only useful for servers. That really wouldn’t 
> work with a switch\router. Switches and routers are going to be the bulk of 
> what we’re dealing with. 
> 
> I am finding locking power cables, but that seems to be specific to the PDU 
> you’re using as it requires the other half of the lock on the PDU. 
> 
> I did come across colored power cords. I wonder with some enforced cable 
> management, colored power cables, etc. we would have “good enough”? You get 
> some 1U or 2U cable organizers, require cables to be secured to the 
> management, vertical cables in shared spaces are bound together by customer, 
> color of Velcro matches color of the power cord? Blue customer, green 
> customer, red customer, etc. Could do the cat6 patch cables that way too, but 
> that gets lost when moving to glass or DACs. 
> 
> I thought about a web cam that would record anyone coming into the cabinet, 
> but Equinix doesn’t really allow pictures in their facilities, so that’s not 
> going to fly. Door contacts should be helpful for an audit log of at least 
> when the doors were opened or closed. 
> 
> Financial penalty from the violator to the victim if there’s an uh oh? 
> 
> I’m not trying to save someone from themselves. I’m not trying to lock the 
> whole thing down. Just trying to prevent mistakes in a shared space. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- 
> Mike Hammett 
> Intelligent Computing Solutions 
> http://www.ics-il.com 
> 
> Midwest-IX 
> http://www.midwest-ix.com 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> 
> From: "Mike Hammett" < na...@ics-il.net > 
> To: "North American Network Operators' Group" < nanog@nanog.org > 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 8:59:08 AM 
> Subject: Shared cabinet "security" 
> 
> I say "security" because I know that in a shared space, nothing is completely 
> secure. I also know that with enough intent, someone will accomplish whatever 
> they set out to do regarding breaking something of someone else's. My concern 
> is mainly towards mitigation of accidents. This could even apply to a certain 
> degree to things within your own space and your own careless techs 
> 
> If you have multiple entities in a shared space, how can you mitigate the 
> chances of someone doing something (assuming accidentally) to disrupt your 
> operations? I'm thinking accidentally unplug the wrong power cord, patch 
> cord, etc. Accidentally power off or reboot the wrong device. 
> 
> Obviously labels are an easy way to point out to someone that's looking at 
> the right place at the right time. Some devices have a cage around the power 
> cord, but some do not. 
> 
> Any sort of mesh panels you could put on the front\rear of your gear that you 
> would mount with the same rack screw that holds your gear in? 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- 
> Mike Hammett 
> Intelligent Computing Solutions 
> http://www.ics-il.com 
> 
> Midwest-IX 
> http://www.midwest-ix.com 
> 
> 







Reply via email to