Hi Alain and all the rest I het it now
no offense and alain no harm done and all of nanog thank you and i will continue observing as i have since 1995 thank you allagin PS and BTW i am interested in CLOUD :-) thanks once more > On Jun 19, 2017, at 9:36 AM, Alain Hebert <aheb...@pubnix.net> wrote: > > Hi, > > Yes Stephen, we're talking the usual like GTT... > > And no latency wise they're about the same. In the 35ms range. > > But I still can't figure out the 10 x drop, that level of latency alone > cannot be the factor. > > ( And Gordy... what?!? ) > > ----- > Alain Hebert aheb...@pubnix.net > PubNIX Inc. > 50 boul. St-Charles > P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7 > Tel: 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.net Fax: 514-990-9443 > > On 06/16/17 19:42, Stephen Fulton wrote: >> Alain, >> >> When you refer to "normal peering" do you mean Internet transit? Or are >> these PNI's with Google? Do the GCLD instance you reach through "normal >> peering" have higher latency than through TorIX? >> >> -- Stephen >> >> On 2017-06-16 6:58 PM, Alain Hebert wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Anyone aware of different traffic behavior depending if the target goes >>> through normal peering than through an exchanges google exists in? >>> >>> We're facing a weird issue where the same GCLD Instance can upload up >>> to 200Mbps (Ref 1) if the target path goes through, lets say TorIX, but >>> cannot get more than 20Mbps on similar hosts (8 of them) sittings on our >>> peering links. >>> >>> PS; Those sames hosts get up to their link limit ( 1Gbps ) between each >>> others and others test points we have; >>> >>> PS: Wireshark capture show nothing abnormal; >>> >>> PS: Links aren't congested, and so on... >>> >>> Ref 1 - 200Mbps is on a link rate-limited to 300Mbps. Its my only test >>> point with a TorIX access >>> >> > >
