Thanks Tom,
Yeah my test points VM's where all FreeBSD 10.3/11.0, so I decided
to randomize some of them and added a CentOS on my Telia peer (10Gbps),
and start getting normal performance from GCLD ( In the 500Mbps/500Mbps
range )
PS: Even weirderer(tm) The *BSD VMs always performed correctly in
the past, but not for this particular case.
I have some work left to normalizing those peers, the same tactic
didn't work on the other ones.
if anyone have some lead on a TCP stream analyzer that would cut
down on the number of naps I need to take looking for clues in wireshark
captures.
-----
Alain Hebert aheb...@pubnix.net
PubNIX Inc.
50 boul. St-Charles
P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7
Tel: 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.net Fax: 514-990-9443
On 06/21/17 11:12, Tom Beecher wrote:
Just did a quick test from a personal VM, no throughput difference
over direct peering, public IX, or transit. GCP might have a
bottleneck in your case though, might be a good idea to ask them.
Also, I'll have what Gordon is having.
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 8:49 PM, Gordon Cook <c...@cookreport.com
<mailto:c...@cookreport.com>> wrote:
Hi Alain and all the rest
I het it now
no offense and alain no harm done and all of nanog thank you and i
will continue observing as i have since 1995
thank you allagin
PS and BTW i am interested in CLOUD
:-)
thanks once more
> On Jun 19, 2017, at 9:36 AM, Alain Hebert <aheb...@pubnix.net
<mailto:aheb...@pubnix.net>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Yes Stephen, we're talking the usual like GTT...
>
> And no latency wise they're about the same. In the 35ms range.
>
> But I still can't figure out the 10 x drop, that level of
latency alone cannot be the factor.
>
> ( And Gordy... what?!? )
>
> -----
> Alain Hebert aheb...@pubnix.net <mailto:aheb...@pubnix.net>
> PubNIX Inc.
> 50 boul. St-Charles
> P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7
> Tel: 514-990-5911 <tel:514-990-5911> http://www.pubnix.net
Fax: 514-990-9443 <tel:514-990-9443>
>
> On 06/16/17 19:42, Stephen Fulton wrote:
>> Alain,
>>
>> When you refer to "normal peering" do you mean Internet
transit? Or are these PNI's with Google? Do the GCLD instance you
reach through "normal peering" have higher latency than through TorIX?
>>
>> -- Stephen
>>
>> On 2017-06-16 6:58 PM, Alain Hebert wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Anyone aware of different traffic behavior depending if
the target goes through normal peering than through an exchanges
google exists in?
>>>
>>> We're facing a weird issue where the same GCLD Instance
can upload up to 200Mbps (Ref 1) if the target path goes through,
lets say TorIX, but cannot get more than 20Mbps on similar hosts
(8 of them) sittings on our peering links.
>>>
>>> PS; Those sames hosts get up to their link limit ( 1Gbps )
between each others and others test points we have;
>>>
>>> PS: Wireshark capture show nothing abnormal;
>>>
>>> PS: Links aren't congested, and so on...
>>>
>>> Ref 1 - 200Mbps is on a link rate-limited to 300Mbps. Its my
only test point with a TorIX access
>>>
>>
>
>