On Thu, Jun 22, 2017, at 08:18, Mukom Akong T. wrote: > > On 18 June 2017 at 17:36, Radu-Adrian Feurdean <nanog@radu- > adrian.feurdean.net> wrote:>> so for the record, business customers are much > more active in >> *rejecting* IPv6, either explictely (they say they want it >> disabled) or>> implicitly (they install their own router, not configured >> for >> IPv6). The>> bigger the business, the bigger the chance of rejection. > > > Did they per chance state their reasons for rejecting it?
Not explicitly. But when we get something like "turn off that IPv6 crap !" we take it for: - they don't have a clearly defined need for it - they don't know how to deal with it - they don't want to deal with things they don't need (see the irst point)... usually all of them at the same time. To make it short : education. And we as as small ISP we have neither the resources, nor the motivation (because $$$ on the issue is negative) to do it (the education). -- R-A.F.
