I don't see why there should not be a way to know who is publishing data on the 
Internet.  In almost all other forms of communication, there is some 
accountability for the origination of information.  Newspaper publishers are 
known, radio stations are usually licensed and publicly known, television is 
licensed as well.  Your phone and Internet traffic is available to the 
government and law enforcement.  People need to be held legally accountable for 
the information they present to the public otherwise you would have absolutely 
no recourse in the event that you were slandered, scammed, or otherwise harmed 
by this information.  People being scared of their government is a real thing, 
however it is not up to the Internet to protect people from their own 
governments, that is a political problem not a technical one.  Always think of 
the negative side of the argument.  If a website was distributing unauthorized 
compromising photos of your children would you want them to be completely 
anonymous? 

Think of how aggravated we all are with the spam we receive every day and how 
much you like spoofed caller ID data when you talk about anonymity.       

Publishing information for access by the entire public should have some sort of 
accountability with it.

When you get into the business of "protecting" people from their own 
"oppressive" governments, you are also protecting "enemies and criminals" from 
another perspective.  Most all nation states would have the ability to track 
the communications to their source in any case so all you are really doing is 
protecting the data from the public.

It would appear to me that the ICANN proposal is nothing more than a means to 
monetize what used to be public data.  Why should Google have all the fun?

Steven Naslund
Chicago IL





-----Original Message-----
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of b...@theworld.com
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2018 2:11 PM
To: Tei
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Is WHOIS going to go away?


On April 20, 2018 at 12:03 oscar.vi...@gmail.com (Tei) wrote:
 > Maybe a good balance for whois is to include organization information
 > so I know where a website is hosted, but not personal information, so
 > I can't show in their house and steal their dog.
 > 
 > I feel uneasy about having my phone available to literally everyone on
 > the internet.

There are various privacy options available when one registers a
domain, generally a matter of checking a box and usually free.

 > 
 > 
 > -- 
 > --
 > ℱin del ℳensaje.

-- 
        -Barry Shein

Software Tool & Die    | b...@theworld.com             | http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: +1 617-STD-WRLD       | 800-THE-WRLD
The World: Since 1989  | A Public Information Utility | *oo*

Reply via email to