On 20/Jun/18 06:06, Jared Mauch wrote: > I know. They’re very popular in the WISP and FTTH communities that are doing > sub-10G as their aggregate bits. I understand the price appeal but not a fan > personally. Not a fan either for the backbone, even though a lot of ISP's in South Africa use them for this... admittedly, small networks that simply don't have the cash to dish out to the big vendors. I know we've had some issues setting up BGP sessions with MikroTik-based customers/peers, mainly around how RouterOS interprets various BGP-related RFC's. But for the home, I can't fault them. They do fix plenty of bugs (almost as much as they push out new features). I have seen some IPv6 bug fixes in recent updates they've published, but nothing that really makes a difference to my home world, as far as I can remember. Mark.
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need ... Job Snijders
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: ... Rubens Kuhl
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: ... Ca By
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was ... Job Snijders
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? ... Ca By
- Re: IPv6 faster/better pro... Job Snijders
- Re: IPv6 faster/bette... Jared Mauch
- Re: IPv6 faster/bette... Seth Mattinen
- Re: IPv6 faster/bette... Jeremy Austin
- Re: IPv6 faster/bette... Jared Mauch
- Re: IPv6 faster/bette... Mark Tinka
- Re: IPv6 faster/bette... Mike Hammett
- Re: IPv6 faster/bette... Mark Tinka
- Re: IPv6 faster/bette... JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG
- Re: IPv6 faster/bette... Mark Tinka
- Re: IPv6 faster/bette... JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG
- Re: IPv6 faster/bette... Mark Tinka
- Re: IPv6 faster/bette... JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG
- Re: IPv6 faster/bette... Mark Tinka
- Re: IPv6 faster/bette... Jared Mauch
- Re: IPv6 faster/bette... Randy Bush