On 5/Mar/19 08:26, Mark Andrews wrote: > It does work as designed except when crap middleware is added. ECMP > should be using the flow label with IPv6. It has the advantage that > it works for non-0-offset fragments as well as 0-offset fragments and > also works for transports other than TCP and UDP. This isn’t a protocol > failure. It is shitty implementations. That's what I mean... we find ways to break protocols ourselves. Mark.
- ICMPv6 "too-big" packets ignored (filtered ?)... Jean-Daniel Pauget
- Re: ICMPv6 "too-big" packets ignored (fi... Saku Ytti
- Re: ICMPv6 "too-big" packets ignored... Mark Andrews
- Re: ICMPv6 "too-big" packets ign... Mark Tinka
- Re: ICMPv6 "too-big" packets... Mark Andrews
- Re: ICMPv6 "too-big" pa... Mark Tinka
- Re: ICMPv6 "too-big" pa... Joel Jaeggli
- Re: ICMPv6 "too-big" pa... Thomas Bellman
- Re: ICMPv6 "too-big"... sthaug
- Re: ICMPv6 "too-big"... Stephen Satchell
- Re: ICMPv6 "too-big&... Bjørn Mork
- Re: ICMPv6 "too-big&... Hunter Fuller
- Re: ICMPv6 "too-big" pa... Fernando Gont
- Re: ICMPv6 "too-big"... Mark Andrews
- Re: ICMPv6 "too-big" packets ign... Saku Ytti
- Re: ICMPv6 "too-big" packets... Joel Jaeggli

