Hello NANOG,

We are discussing internally and wanted to get more opinions and especially 
more data on what are people actually doing.
We are running an ISP network with about 150K fixed broadband users, running 
dual stack (IPv4 behind CGNAT).
On the ISP network  IPv6 is simply routed, and is firewalled on the CPE.

This network added mobile services about a year ago, also dual stack (we have 
no control on the mobile devices so we were too concerned to choose IPv6 only 
access).
We have an ongoing discussion about Gi firewall (adding a firewall between the 
subscribers and the internet, allowing only subscriber initiated connections), 
for the IPv6 traffic.

The firewall is doing very little security, the ruleset is very basic, allowing 
anything from subscribers to the internet and blocking all traffic from the 
internet towards the subscribers.
We have a few rules to limit the number of connections per subscriber (to a 
relatively high number) and that is it.

One of the arguments in favor of having the firewall is that unsolicited 
traffic from the internet can “wake” idle mobile devices, and create signaling 
(paging) storms as well as drain user batteries.

On the other hand, allowing only subscriber initiated traffic is mostly 
achievable using ACLs on the mobile core facing routers, or is it with the 
growing percentage of UDP traffic ?

BTW – I don’t mention IPv4 traffic on the mobile network as it’s all behind 
CGNAT which don’t allow internet initiated connections.

Anyway, we are very interested to know hear more opinions,  and especially to 
hear what are other mobile operators do.

Regards

Amos




Reply via email to