Greg, Jonathan mentions " By "slow" I mean there is a lot of latency. The cursor can move fast; the cursor moves straight to anywhere I touch. But there is a noticable delay between touching and cursor movement. If I drag the stylus across the screen, the cursor is a few mm behind. "
I saw the same behavior using tslib. Using TSLIB there will be a cursor (I think tslib draws the cursor), while using the old interface, there is not such cursor. So I cannot compare the two. However, one problem using this patch is that, using "top" I saw nano-x using 99% of CPU, So it looks there is some issue with this patch. -Yi On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 7:36 AM, Greg Haerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I tested wich nano-X 0.91 and it works. > Jonathan reported some latency between touching the screen and updating > the cursor. Do you have this problem as well? > > Regards, > > Greg > >
