Luckily the CPU load issue cannot be observed now (It looks like an issue specific to certain board). So I think this patch works well. -Yi
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 3:03 PM, yi li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > However, one problem using this patch is that, using "top" I saw nano-x > using 99% of CPU, So it looks there is some issue with this patch. > > -Yi > > > > On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 7:36 AM, Greg Haerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > I tested wich nano-X 0.91 and it works. > > Jonathan reported some latency between touching the screen and updating > > the cursor. Do you have this problem as well? > > > > Regards, > > > > Greg > > > > >
