On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 04:53:55PM -0700, Steven Vahl wrote: > * Is there a way for the client to find out somehow if the server is > still working on a previous GrPoly command? If so, then the client > could just "drop" any datasets that come in until the server and > display had completed the one they were working on, preventing the > server from becoming overloaded.
try adding a call to GrFlush() after the call to GrPoly(). that will keep the commands from stacking up. > * Is there some other approach I could use to plot the data that would > be faster? the line draw routines in nano-X have a large potential for optimization by moving line draw to the driver level. how much work do you want to do to speed this up? -- Aaron J. Grier | "Not your ordinary poofy goof." | agr...@poofygoof.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: nanogui-unsubscr...@linuxhacker.org For additional commands, e-mail: nanogui-h...@linuxhacker.org
