: I've came to a conclusion, that it
: has to do with the fact that i've compiled it on 64 bit architecture.

You're right!

: 1) Why is there a new define of DWORD in image_bmp.c? Would be better
: to include windef.h, right?

Yes.  Or at least not redefine and use DWORD.  I'll look into
this, I'm not sure yet that I want windef.h to be a dependency
in the api-independent engine/ source.


: 2) Maybe it would be better to define 64 bit architecture in config?
: Something like X86_64_BIT?

Actually, someone has already produced a patch for 64 bit
compiles, which do not require any config requirement.
I had held off on this because of the need to move
to the u_int_32 typedef's etc.  I think its perhaps time
to patch the source with these updates.  They involved
many changes, as the current source pretty much has
assumed sizeof(long)=32.

Regards,

Greg

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: nanogui-unsubscr...@linuxhacker.org
For additional commands, e-mail: nanogui-h...@linuxhacker.org

Reply via email to