Scott Hernandez wrote: >I don't consider this overly negative, but I am curious what the build >patterns are. > What do you mean by build patterns ??
> > >Anyway, I really don't care one way or another, I just think that at >this point, without more user feedback, and comments, I don't see one >way as more standard than the other. It is like saying that potato chips >are better than ham. > not at all. Another issue is the schema generation. If the tasks actually loaded partly depend on a build file then you're going to need that build file to determine a schema. Without that NAnt can always generate a schema based on its config file and its default directories without knowing about any .build files. > >(If you've been following the Jakarta commons/general lists, I would >point out this is like a "bike shed" problem.) > no I haven't. can explain the reference ? > > >Once we have a config file, this all becomes moot. > So you're saying that when we have a config file we no longer load tasks out of the projects base dir ? >Ian > _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
