Gerry Shaw wrote:
>It does seem like a pretty good solution but what we have does work and
>has been tested and isn't causing any problems that I know of. Its also
>a lot fewer files.
>
>Still it's a pretty good sample and I'll likely use it in other
>projects.
>
>Thanks
>
>
>
>>A sample just (a few days ago) got released on gotdotnet that
>>tracks line numbers for a DOM object. It extends the DOM
>>objects, and tracks the information internally. I think this
>>would be a good way of doing it, instead of the current way.
>>Any comments?
>>
>>"Example showing how to extend the System.Xml DOM classes.
>>The derived classes implement the IXmlLineInfo interface
>>which allows users to return line information on the XML
>>documents." - http://www.gotdotnet.com/userfiles/XMLDom/extendDOM.zip
>>
>>
>>
>>
In fact the XPathNvavigator already inplements the IXmlLineInfo
interface so you don't need to write your own derived classes. However I
agree with Gerry that what we have works now o theres no need to change
it. Besides that was my first contribution to Nant :)
Ian
_______________________________________________________________
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
_______________________________________________
Nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
