Great. It would help if you (or really anyone) went through the last build (http://nant.sf.net/builds) and played the role of a user. What looks out of date, what looks like it is missing, what need to be done?
Maybe the answer is, most of it is okay; and we should roll with a release. I'm feeling this way, but don't know if anyone else has spent any time looking at things. I'd feel better if other gave the thumbs up, or at least said they didn't see any glaring holes. I'm really leaning towards tossing a build out in the next day or so with the cvs changelog and not many more docs. Scott ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Griffiths" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [snip] > I found this utility http://www.red-bean.com/cvs2cl/ and ran it against the > nant repository. The generated output is attached (generated using the > command "perl ..\cvs2cl.pl --delta rel-0-7-9-0:HEAD"). Cool, that helps. I just need to integrate this into the package target. [snip] > Yep, that's what I would do. Just zip it up and release it for now. You > can always create a new release in a few weeks with updated docs, readme's > and possibly an installer. Yep, that is my hope too. If all goes well we will get some good feedback from the release, and start a new, and more frequent, release schedule. > Let me know if you want me to undertake any specific tasks. I've can manage > a few hours of daytime work over the next week or so. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
