----- Original Message -----
From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jaroslaw Kowalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Martin Aliger"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 5:15 PM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] PATCH: Expression evaluator for NAnt
> I certainly agree that the proposed syntax is cleaner and having used
> the current implementation I think it works well and fits into the
> existing framework without needing existing scripts to change.
I agree that its much cleaner (but I still haven't had time to use the
current implementation ... shame on me ..)...
My only concern is backward compatibilty ... However, I have no probem
breaking backward compatibilty at this stage if its worth the trouble ...
And is this case, it could indeed be worth it ...
I'll try to find some time this weekend to test the current implementation,
but I first have to get the beta 1 release of NAnt 0.84 out of the door ...
>It will
> be a shame it we have to rename tasks with a - in their names but if
> there are only 6 of them that is probably acceptable. I'd rather change
> the names and dissallow dashs as well then revert to using the
> propertyvalue('nant.tasks.cvs-checkout.location') syntax which is kinda
> klunky.
I agree ...
I just want to be sure that there are no more drawbacks "lurking" (is this
the right word ?) for this implementation, other than that I definitely like
it ...
Gert
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
