Hmm, that's no good. In my world it's better with no version at all then wrong version. It's giving me a lot of headache as I can't know, or prove what version I'm using. Nor can I distribute this to my team as I can not later on know weather or not they have upgraded or not. It ought to also give this list problems knowing what version was used. I suggest that the version information is removed until a "fool proof" way of keeping it up to date is devised.
I hope Clayton believes me when I assure him I am using the latest version :) /Nicke > -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Aliger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: den 8 januari 2004 14:58 > To: Nicklas Norling; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Nightly builds > > > In header > > > NAnt 0.85 (Build 0.85.1447.0; net-1.0.win32; nightly; 2003-12-18) > > Copyright (C) 2001-2004 Gerry Shaw > > net-version and date is hard coded right now. I already > report that but noone find any time to fix it yet. > > Despite of that nant version is correctly built and you could > use it without problems! > > Martin ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html _______________________________________________ nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
