Gert Driesen wrote:
yes I think so. I mean we could get away with using a small install.build file. Yeah I know I know - I just said in a previous mail that build/makefiles aren't necessarily the best choice for installers but it would be easy to write and it would be X-platform.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Nant-Developers (E-Mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 20, 2004 11:44 AM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Re: install targets
The current layout is already confusing. How many "I downloaded version x of nant but the test failed when building" emails do we get - to which we reply "you don't need to build - its already there". If there is no makefile or NAnt.build in the binary distribution then this won't happen.
But we do include a shell script for installing NAnt (and creating a wrapper script on linux) in the binary distribution ?
No - If I get a chance I'd like to - or if someone out there with rpm building skills would like to volunteer - that would be great too.
PS. Have you have looked into creating an RPM for NAnt ?
Ian
------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 _______________________________________________ nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
