> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Matthew W. Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 10:28 PM
> Subject: RE: [Nant-users] Licensing Components
>

> You're quite right, of course! That was a bit of an aggressive fix...
>
> I'm using the <solution> task. I'll run three tests against a minimal
> example
>
> 1a) Run using the current build
> 1b) Run using my (less aggressively) modified version - which just takes
> out the IsLicensed thing.

LicenseManager.IsLicensed is only used in the log statement, this doesn't
actually change anythink ....

> 2) Run using 0.83 build

I'm definitely interested in this.  If everything should work fine in NAnt
0.83, then this means that this issue is caused by the fact that we now
generate the license in a separate AppDomain to avoid assembly clashes ...

> 3) Run lc.exe - which is, of course, remarkably similar in
> implementation to the license task

lc.exe prior to .NET 2.0 has a serious bug which actually makes it useless
to compile licx files ... Otherwise, I would've definitely changed the
<license> task to wrap this command line tool ...

However, I will probably change the <license> task to use lc.exe when
targeting .NET 2.0.

If I have time, I'll probably add an attribute/property called
"separatedomain" to the <license> task that allows you to specifiy whether
you want to have a separate AppDomain created, and set it to false by
default.

I'll try to upload a new nightly build containing this last change later
tonight (if the sf.net servers allow me to, pfffffff) ....

Hrty




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Robotic Monkeys at ThinkGeek
For a limited time only, get FREE Ground shipping on all orders of $35
or more. Hurry up and shop folks, this offer expires April 30th!
http://www.thinkgeek.com/freeshipping/?cpg=12297
_______________________________________________
Nant-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-users

Reply via email to