See inline comments: > So if I understand you right, the components will automatically be > mapped to the directories, and I don't have to specify them, just the > feature(s) and the directory structure? If so, that makes a big > difference (I already have a script snippet that generates the xml > structure for the directory tree). >
When defining a component, you'll need to explicitly specify the feature and the directory that the component is related to. > And I also agree, that being able to use an implied directory structure > would help a big plus. Unfortunately, modifications to the task are > riskly before the proposed refactoring is done to (at least) to remove > the duplication -- hopefully we'll have some unit tests after that > too. It is the holidays, hmmm... > Agreed, I don't think that how files are included should be changed until after the refactor. Jim ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ NAntContrib-Developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nantcontrib-developer
