+1. Sad that the code base diversification between 8 and 9 begins now … /M
On 20 Oct 2014, at 14:48, Attila Szegedi <[email protected]> wrote: > Folks, > > I had to make minor adjustments for this patch when backporting it to 8. The > reason is that constructors for FunctionNode differ in 9 and 8 after > JDK-8012518 (bottom up parser), which is a 9-only change (and so the > divergence begins…) > > A difference between the 9 and 8 codebase is available at > <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~attila/8059844/webrev-8-backport/index.html>. > Could you please review it? It's only a change in the modified constructors' > invocations. > > Thanks, > Attila. > > On Oct 17, 2014, at 2:23 PM, Hannes Wallnoefer <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> +1 for webrev.02. Good work keeping recompilation overhead at reasonable >> levels! >> >> Hannes >> >> Am 2014-10-07 um 13:52 schrieb Attila Szegedi: >>> Please review JDK-8059844 at >>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~attila/8059844/webrev.00> for >>> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8059844> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Attila. >> >
