By the way: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reamde <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reamde> :-)
> On Dec 8, 2015, at 12:47 PM, Sundararajan Athijegannathan > <sundararajan.athijegannat...@oracle.com > <mailto:sundararajan.athijegannat...@oracle.com>> wrote: > > Thanks Attila. I changed that and pushed it. > > Yes, it seems that few operation extraction static methods would be useful. > > -Sundar > > On 12/8/2015 4:00 PM, Attila Szegedi wrote: >> A bit of a nitpick: >> >> if (getProp && name instanceof String) { >> String nameStr = (String)name; >> if (nameStr.equals("stream")) { >> >> can be replaced with >> >> if (getProp && “stream”.equals(name)) { >> Other than that, +1. Still very happy that you’re producing these examples >> :-) >> >> I’m wondering if maybe “getFirstStandardOperation” would make sense to add >> as a static method to StandardOperation… >> >> Attila. >> >> >>> On Dec 8, 2015, at 9:05 AM, Sundararajan Athijegannathan >>> <sundararajan.athijegannat...@oracle.com >>> <mailto:sundararajan.athijegannat...@oracle.com>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I've updated webrev to include another sample (treating nio Buffer objects >>> like arrays). Updated webrev is @ >>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Esundar/8144841/webrev.01/>http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8144841/webrev.01/ >>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8144841/webrev.01/> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> -Sundar >>> >>> On 12/8/2015 1:31 PM, Michael Haupt wrote: >>>> Hi Sundar, >>>> >>>> lower-case thumbs up! >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> >>>> Michael >>>> >>>>> Am 07.12.2015 um 16:46 schrieb Sundararajan Athijegannathan < >>>>> <mailto:sundararajan.athijegannat...@oracle.com>sundararajan.athijegannat...@oracle.com >>>>> <mailto:sundararajan.athijegannat...@oracle.com>>: >>>>> >>>>> Please review http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8144841/ >>>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Esundar/8144841/> for >>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8144841 >>>>> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8144841> >>>>> >>>>> Adding a README for dynalink samples as Marcus suggested earlier. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> -Sundar >>> >> >