In fact there's https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8157723, which was filed by you and waiting for me. I actually dug it up earlier today. The fix you suggested seems to be working, so it looks like we should do this.
Advertising
Hannes > Am 17.10.2016 um 17:27 schrieb Attila Szegedi <szege...@gmail.com>: > >> >> On 17 Oct 2016, at 03:21, Hannes Wallnöfer <hannes.wallnoe...@oracle.com> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Esben, >> >> >>> Am 17.10.2016 um 09:11 schrieb Esben Andreasen <es...@esbena.dk>: >>> >>> A. >>> Where can I read about such non-ECMA-standard features in Nashorn? >>> >> >> https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/Nashorn/Nashorn+extensions >> >> I don’t think the string methods from java.lang.String are contained in that >> page because, as Attila said, it is a side effect of using java.lang.String >> as JS string representation and transparently exposing Java methods to >> scripts. > > I was thinking that maybe we shoud switch off Java methods on Nashorn > primitives with --no-java. A quick test shows we don’t do that now. > > Attila.
